Rollins Varsity Debate Team

greatdebate.jpg

PHOTOS: The Great Debate: Rollins vs. Beijing Foreign Studies University, January 29th, 2013

 

The Great Debate: Rollins debates job outsourcing with Beijing students

 

 

Rollins Varsity Debate Team

 

PHOTOS:  Rollins Debate Team vs. Cambridge Debate Society, April 5, 2012  

 

ORLANDO SENTINEL:  Trayvon Martin: Rollins College debates gun law with Cambridge team, April 10, 2012


Star Invitational, Jacksonville State College, Jacksonville Florida, November 8-11, 2012.

On November 8th and 9th, the members of the Rollins College Varsity Debate Team participated in an electrifying debate competition at the Florida State College at Jacksonville at the South Campus.  This was a state-wide debate competition so Rollins competed against other Floridacolleges and universities (Florida State University, Miami Dade Community College, Florida Southern College, University of Central Florida, etc.)  The topics at this competition included, stopping subsidies for companies that outsource jobs, the separation of church and state, and reducing the amount of candy kids eat. 

The final round featured a debate between Rollins, represented by Zohaib Jessani and David Gevorgyan, and a team from Florida State University.  The topic of the round was: This House Believes that the United States should sign onto the Treaty for the International Criminal Court.  Both teams performed well but Rollins lost in a 2 to 1 decision to the Florida State Team.  Nevertheless, Rollins was awarded best overall debate team, 1st Place in Sweepstakes Points, 2nd place in Parliamentary Debate, 1st place, 4rdplace, and 6th place Speaker Awards.  

 

John G. Fee Invitational, Berea College, Berea Kentucky, October 18-21, 2012.

 On the weekend of October 18, 2012, the Rollins College Debate Team participated in a mid-west regional debate competition at Berea College in Berea Kentucky.  This debate competition featured teams from Ohio, Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, and Florida.  As is customary in parliamentary debates, audience members were encouraged to shout cheers and jeers while the speakers offered arguments in favor of and against issues such as the Dream Act, Fracking, Subsidies, and globalization.  The Rollins Debate Team posted a record of 5 and 1 in the preliminary rounds, but, unfortunately, lost in the first elimination round by a vote of 2 to 1.  Nevertheless, Rollins was award 7th Place in the Competition and 3rd Place in Parliamentary Speaking. 


  
NPDA Novice National Competition - Lafayette College

Rollins College is a member of the National Parliamentary Debate Association which is the largest debate association in America with more than 1,100 members.  During spring break the novice members of the Rollins Debate Team attended the National Parliamentary Debate Association’s Novice National Competition in Philadelphia, PA.  We performed excellently!  I am extremely happy to announce that we are currently ranked second nationally in novice parliamentary debate, we have the second and third best novice parliamentary debaters in the country, Melissa Fussell #2 and Rebecca Wilson #3, and we are the fourth best novice team overall, i.e. in all categories of competition, i.e. debate, impromptu speaking, etc.  Please join me in congratulating Melissa Fussell and Rebecca Wilson and the member of the debate team on a job well done.

 

Marks Invitational - University of West Florida

On Saturday January 27, 2012, members of the Rollins College Debate Team participated in a southeastern regional debate competition at the University of West Florida in Pensacola Florida.  This competition featured debate teams from college and universities throughout the southeastern region of the United States.  As is customary in parliamentary debates, audience members were encouraged to shout cheers and jeers while the speakers offered arguments in favor of and against issues such as humanitarian intervention in Africa, universal language requirements for high school graduates, occupy wall street movement, and so on.  The Rollins Debate Team posted a record of 4 and 0 in the preliminary rounds and made it to the semi-final round where they lost by a vote of 2 to 1, and ultimately took third place in the southeastern regional debate competition.
 

Star Invitational - Florida State College at Jacksonville

Over the weekend of November 12th, members of the Rollins College Varsity Debate Team participated in an electrifying debate competition at the Florida State College at Jacksonville at the South Campus.  This was a state-wide competition so Rollins competed against other schools in the state of Florida.  The topic of debate ranged from salary caps in Major League Baseball to Herman Cain’s 999 Federal Tax Plan.  The final round featured a debate between Rollins and Florida College.  The topic of the round was: This House Believes that the United States should sign onto the Treaty for the International Criminal Court.  Both teams performed well but it was the Rollins Team who performed the best, winning first place in Star Invitational Parliamentary Debate Competition and fourth place in the category of Best Speaker.
 

Cumberland Swing - Berea College

On Friday, October 21, 2011, members of the Rollins College Debate Team participated in a mid-west regional debate competition at Berea College in Berea Kentucky.  This debate competition featured teams from Ohio, Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, and Florida.  As is customary in parliamentary debates, audience members were encouraged to shout cheers and jeers while the speakers offered arguments in favor of and against issues such as standardized testing, vocational education, the International Criminal Court, same-sex marriage, Herman Cain’s 999 plan, and globalization.  The Rollins Debate Team posted a record of 4 and 2 in the preliminary rounds and sweep through the elimination rounds all the way to the finals.  The final round featured University of Miami of Ohio versus Rollins College.  The resolution for the final round was: Globalization is bad for developing countries.  Rollins debated the affirmative and Miami of Ohio debated the opposition.  Rollins lost by a vote of 2 to 1 and ultimately took second place in the mid-west regional debate competition.
 

Healthcare Debate - Winter Park University Club

On Wednesday, September 13, 2011, members of the Rollins College Debate Team participated in a spirited debate competition at the Winter Park University Club.  In keeping with the customary practices of parliamentary debates, audience members were encouraged to shout cheers and jeers while the speakers offered arguments in favor of and against the resolution: The United States Federal Government must institute universal healthcare immediately.  As is the custom for University Club debates, the members of the audience were invited to asked questions before the rebuttal speeches.  It is also the practice of the University Club to allow its members to determine the result of the debate.  Because the questions were evenly balanced it was not possible to determine which side of the debate the audience favored.  In the end, however, the audience voted 39 to 18 in favor of the proposition.
 

ITT Tech Invitational - ITT Technical College

On Wednesday, July 20, members of the Rollins College Varsity Debate Team participated in an electrifying debate competition at ITT Tech’s Lake Mary campus.  For the first time ever ITT Tech hosted an exhibition debate featuring the Rollins Debate Team on the topics of (1) national standardized testing and (2) using the International Criminal Court to prosecute the perpetrators of torture at Guantanamo Bay.
The debate was organized by ITT English Instructor Sarah Beth Hopton as part of an ongoing intellectual exchange between ITT and Rollins College.  Moreover, it was well attended by ITT students, guests, and instructors; even the Associate Dean of General Studies, Leslie Gibson, was in attendance.  As is customary in parliamentary debates, the members of the audience were encouraged to shout cheers and jeers while the speakers offered arguments in favor of and against standardized testing and using the International Criminal Court to prosecute American citizens.  The audience was also invited to judge the debate and determine the winners.
Speaking about this event, Rollins Alumni Associate Dean Gibson remarked: “What a pleasure it was to have you and your debate team members here at ITT Tech to demonstrate the power of language to our students!” She continued: “I especially appreciated the agenda that you prepared for Ms. Hopton’s composition class that allowed the audience to see the preparation  and strategy behind the scenes as well as the actual debate.”  Ms. Sarah Beth Hopton added: “I was on quite the intellectual high after the debate, largely because it was so nice to be surrounded by such excellent minds.”  She continued: “Many students commented that it changed their view of debate, and some even said it changed their view of writing and researching, meaning, they finally see the value in English!”
The Rollins team thanked the ITT administration and staff for hosting them and promised to return for more debates in the future.

To Learn More About the Rollins Varsity Debate Team:

Contact Eric Smaw, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Philosophy
Pre-Law Advisor
Debate Team Coach
esmaw@rollins.edu


richard.jpg


chinesestudent.jpg


melissa.jpg


chong.jpg

chastity.com

 

mario.jpg

 

greatbritaindebate.jpg

 

greatbritaindebate2.jpg

 

greatbritaindebate4.jpg

 

greatbritaindebate3.jpg